REACH and CLP, an uneven implementation

Published 
December 3, 2014

The results were worrying: more than half of the SDSs and a quarter of the CLP notifications did not comply with their respective obligations. Furthermore, for the pre-registration and registration requirements, the rate of non-compliance was 12 %.

These numbers do not take into account the extra documents needed for the extended SDS (eSDS). REF-2’s final report should be issued at the next REACH Enforcement Forum meeting in March 2013, which ought to help regulation enforcers.

This information as well as the name of the registrants and the numbers of the REACH registration dossiers are published by ECHA, stressing the imminence of the next registration deadline and the threats that weigh on non-compliant companies. After having been accused of being too soft by NGOs last October, ECHA reasserted its authority by revoking registration decisions for companies that had fraudulent registration costs.

The development of the REF-3, which seems to be much stricter, is in motion and will run from February to August 2013. It will deal with registration requirements, Only Representative compliance and the collaboration with customs authorities.

Read ECHA’s press release

Article published in The Molecule 6

Encore +

Articles similaires

Tous
Cosmetics
10
/
21
/
2024

"INFO-TRI": TRIMAN Logo and French Sorting Labeling Guidelines

As environmental regulations evolve across Europe, the TRIMAN logo, based on French regulations, has become an essential requirement for industries such as cosmetics, household products, and food packaging. Many companies are curious about how these regulations affect their operations in the French market. This article explains the key requirements of the TRIMAN logo, its impact across various industries, and trends in European packaging regulations.
Cosmetics
10
/
21
/
2024

Animal Testing Bans: The Fine Line Between Cosmetics and Chemical Regulations in Europe

Over the past decade, the cosmetics industry has faced increasing pressure to eliminate animal testing from all stages of product development. Both the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) have long established comprehensive bans on animal testing for cosmetics. However, recent developments in regulatory practices—particularly the intersection between cosmetics regulations and broader chemical safety rules like REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals)—are sparking new debates. While the bans remain firmly in place, the fine line between the Cosmetic Products Regulation (CPR) and REACH has led to legal cases and calls for further clarification.
Cosmetics
10
/
18
/
2024

Health Alert on Brazilian Hair Straightening Products: Risks of Glyoxylic Acid

In recent days, French health authorities have issued warnings about the dangers associated with certain hair straightening products, particularly those used for "Brazilian hair straightening." The primary concern is glyoxylic acid, a common ingredient in these products, which can lead to severe health effects, especially concerning kidney function.